Legal
Transcription for legal work
Lawyers and paralegals working with recorded statements, hearings, and client calls.
The problem
Legal transcription is expensive per hour and slow to come back, but the record has to be exact.
- Outsourced legal transcription comes back days later and costs by the hour
- A multi-party hearing reads as one undifferentiated block of text
- Verifying a disputed passage means listening to the whole recording again
What changes
Fast verbatim transcripts with timecodes and speaker labels that you review rather than type.
- Verbatim record with exact timecodes
- Speakers separated across multi-party recordings
- Turnaround in minutes, not days
What matters here
Review is still required
This is an AI transcript, not a certified court transcript. For filings, a human must verify it.
Confidentiality
EU hosting, GDPR, DPA available, and no training on your recordings.
Multi-party recordings
Diarization handles up to six voices, which covers most hearings and depositions.
Legal: common questions
What comes up when the recordings are legal.
Can I file this as a court transcript?
No. This is an AI transcript, not a certified one. For anything going on the record, a human must verify it — we would rather lose the sale than have you find that out in a courtroom.
How well does it separate speakers in a hearing?
Up to six voices, which covers most depositions and hearings. Heavy crosstalk blurs the labels, as it does for any system.
Is client material confidential?
EU hosting under GDPR, DPA available, and recordings never used for training. Deletion removes source audio as well as the transcript.
Be first in when it opens.
Sign-ups are not open yet. Leave your address and you get one email the day they are — sixty minutes free, no card.