Features
AI summaries
Decisions, action items, and owners pulled out of the recording — not a paraphrase of the whole call.
A summary that retells the meeting in shorter words is not useful; you still have to read it all to find the one thing that matters. What is useful is the decision that was made, the thing someone committed to, and who owns it.
That is what the summary extracts. It sits alongside the full transcript, so anything ambiguous can be checked against what was actually said, at the exact timecode.
Decisions and action items
Pulled out as structured points, attributed to the person who committed.
Linked to the transcript
Every point traces back to the moment in the recording it came from.
Works in every language
Summaries are produced across the supported languages, not English only.
Included everywhere
On the free plan too, not gated behind a premium tier.
Questions
Can I trust the summary without reading the transcript?
For low-stakes calls, usually. For anything consequential, check it — every point links back to its timecode precisely so verification takes seconds.
Does it work for languages other than English?
Yes, summaries are produced across the supported languages rather than English only.
Can I change what the summary extracts?
Not yet. It targets decisions, action items, and owners, because that is what people actually reread a meeting for.
Upload your first file now.
Sixty minutes free every month, no card required. See what the transcript looks like on your own audio before you decide anything.